Skip to Content

Human Ethics

The Office of the Vice-President (Research, Innovation and International)’s Office of Research Ethics supports researchers and the Carleton University Research Ethics Boards (CUREB) to ensure their projects with human participants comply with all applicable ethics standards, policies, and guidelines.

The Office of Research Ethics offers administrative support to the REBs and works with researchers to ensure their research projects respect and comply with specifically the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.

All research involving humans conducted by faculty, staff, or students at Carleton University must be approved by a Carleton University Research Ethics Board (CUREB-A or CUREB-B).

Find the applicable research ethics board below to see submission details and deadlines:

CUREB-A

For Arts, Humanities, Business, and Public Affairs research

CUREB-B

For Science, Health, Engineering, Psychology, and Cognitive Science research

Get the Latest News from the Research Ethics Board

Stay informed and learn about the ethical standards and best practices for conducting human participant studies. Check out our past newsletters and subscribe!

Follow the Review Process

The Human Participants ethics review process includes application submission, approval and monitoring. Follow our step-by-step process:

1. Who Needs to Apply for Ethics Review
  • Carleton Researchers: All research involving human participants, as described in the TCPS, conducted by members of the Carleton community must be cleared by the appropriate REB. This includes research conducted at Carleton, research conducted off campus (e.g., businesses, hospitals, prisons, schools), and research approved by another academic institution. For more detailed information, including exemptions from review, see what research needs REB review and the CUREB Scope of Authority Policy.
  • External Researchers Conducting Studies at Carleton: All externally approved research that is taking place on the Carleton campus or specifically targeting Carleton University staff and/or students as participants must have approval by CUREB. However, external studies from an outside institution, with no other Carleton involvement, that have REB approval at their own institution, which do not involve using students as research participants, and that do not request, from any Carleton office, access to non-public contact information, do not need review.

If you are unsure whether your project needs REB review, contact us at ethics@carleton.ca.

2. What Forms Should Be Submitted

Different types of studies require different forms to be submitted to the REB. For information about which form is the right one for your study, see the instructions.

  • Always include a completed Application Checklist prior to submitting a protocol to either REB.  This will help guide you as to what ancillary documents need to be submitted along with your Form. In general, the REB meets to review the final form of any document that is to be seen by any participant or prospective participant.
  • Complete the appropriate form and required attachments, and begin a new application in cuResearch. New users should complete the online form: Create a cuResearch Account.   Go to the section Submit an Application below for information about the process of submitting a proposed study to cuResearch.
  • All students, including undergrads, graduate students and Post-Docs require a Faculty supervisor, and must submit a signed Supervisor Signature Form. Email approval from a supervisor for a student’s project is not accepted. Research projects may be submitted either by the student (so long as the student is registered in the system) or the faculty supervisor. 
  • For more instructions and samples of forms and document templates, visit Forms and Templates.
  • If you are unsure what form and ancillary documents you need to submit for your study, contact us at ethics@carleton.ca.
3. Training
  • Lead Researchers, and all research personnel listed on the relevant submission form must complete the TCPS2 web-based tutorial of by the Tri-Council Panel on Research Ethics, and submit their certificate of completion. Certificates must be less than five years old.
4. Submit an Application

5. Review and Clearance

CUREB-A or -B will review the protocol and determine whether the study is minimal risk (eligible for delegated review) or is greater than minimal risk (study must be reviewed by the full board at a monthly meeting).  Decisions are sent to the researcher via email.

The review team prepares a list of questions, comments, and requirements which is sent to the research team by email for response. 

The research team must respond with appropriate answers, explanations, and revisions, in the form of a point-by-point response letter, and copies of all documents requiring revision with changes highlighted in yellow, through cuResearch.

Once the study revisions are satisfactory, the study will be cleared by the REB and the research team will be notified. Research can begin, subject to any other requirements, only once the clearance letter has been received.

6. Protocol Changes

No substantive changes to a cleared study may be initiated until cleared by the REB, unless the change is made urgently to avert serious harm to a participant or any other person, and the change is submitted as soon thereafter as possible. 

For a fuller description of the REB’s policy on Changes to Protocol, including a description of substantive research, see the CUREB Policy on Review of Changes to Protocol.

To request approval for a study change, prepare and submit a Change to Protocol Form and upload to cuResearch. Outline the changes and include any attachments (e.g., new versions of any research documents, including the submission form, recruitment materials, consent forms, or data collection instruments required to be revised as a result of the proposed Changes.

7. Ongoing Reporting of Study Events

The following events and happenings must be reported to the REB if they occur during your study, in accordance with the Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Form. Here is a brief summary of these reportable events:

  • Adverse Event: Any untoward occurrence affecting a study participant with a reasonable likelihood of being causally related to a study activity or intervention. For example, a data privacy breach or a situation where a participant faints or suffers distress.
  • Material Incidental Finding: Any unanticipated discovery made in the course of research that is outside the scope of the research but that nevertheless will or may significantly affect a participant’s welfare. For example, a finding of suspected child abuse or that a participant has suicidal ideation, or some possibly significant cardiac abnormality on an ECG.
  • Protocol Deviation: Any change or alteration from the study procedures provided in the REB-cleared study protocol, consent documents, or other study materials. A Protocol Deviation may be deliberate (e.g. to avoid potential harm) or unplanned (e.g. by error or oversight, or in response to unexpected circumstances). For example, by oversight, a participant signs an out-of-date version of the consent form or there is a change of location of a research activity.
  • Other Unanticipated Problem: Any unanticipated event that may increase the level of risk to participants or that may affect participants’ welfare or willingness to continue to participate in the study or that may adversely affect data integrity. An Unanticipated Problem includes also the discovery of any new information that may have any of these effects. For example, that a relevant finding discovered in the published literature affects the safety or efficacy of some aspect of study interactions.

If your study involves interactions with people who, it is reasonable to suppose, might express suicidal feelings, you must follow CUREB’s Suicidal Ideation Protocol and submit a completed Suicidal Ideation Reporting Form if required to do so under the protocol.

8. Renewal or Closure

Renewal: According to the TCPS, the REB may only get approval for a maximum of one year, and therefore all studies require annual renewal. Renewal emails are sent out starting one month prior to the anniversary date of the clearance, or most recent previous renewal. You can simply reply to this email, filling in the requested information about the previous year’s study activity.

Closure: When the research concludes, the research team should submit a CUREB Renewal/Closure Form in cuResearch to close the protocol.

Note: We will respond to new submissions in 2-3 business days; however, expect delays due to recent staffing changes and increased application volume during peak periods such as October-February.

*NEW – Revised CUREB Submission Forms are online*
We have completed a substantial revision of our submission forms, which are available below. If you have downloaded copies of any older forms, please do not use them any longer, as the new forms have changed and re-focused many of the questions to allow us to better assess the relevant aspects of your study.
In the new forms, for most questions, we have added a link to instructions to give some background and additional clarification as to what we are looking for in each section.  We hope you will find this to be helpful, particularly for those using the form for the first time.

For further support, access our resources and common human ethics questions:

Contact Us

Email ethics@carleton.ca or a member of our team:

Emily Hersey

Gordon DuVal

Jess Tingley Headshot

Jess Tingley

Karim Abuawad