Skip to Content

Tri-Agency Interdisciplinary Peer Review Committee — Stream

July 29, 2025

Time to read: 4 minutes

To support faculty members holding the rank of Assistant, Associate or Full Professor conducting interdisciplinary research that transcends the traditional boundaries of two or more of the Tri-agencies (SSHRC, NSERC, CIHR) and who intend to submit an application within 12 to 18 months after the end of this grant to:

Interdisciplinarity must be integral to the research design, where the stated objectives could not be achieved without an interdisciplinary approach.

Eligibility

Subject Matter

Research must transcend the traditional boundaries of two or more of the Tri-agencies (SSHRC, NSERC and CIHR).

Principal Investigator

General:

Early Career Researcher (ECR) Applicants:

Established Applicants:

Co-Principal Investigator

Faculty members may only submit one application as PI or co-PI in a given gate to any stream of the Research Development Grant.

Team Member

Budget

Expenses must be eligible under the Tri-Agency Guidelines for Use of Grant Funds.

Eligible Expenses

Note: small equipment (i.e., computers) cannot account for more than one third of the total budget.

Ineligible Expenses

Note: transfers of funds to other institutions are not permitted.

Evaluation

Applications will be scored based on the TAIPR Evaluation Criteria.

  1. Merit of the proposed research (33%)
    • Quality of the proposal: clarity, scope and originality of the research questions and objectives.
    • Methods and approaches: appropriateness of the proposed methods and approaches, including the integration of the interdisciplinary approaches to achieve the project goals.
      • Appropriate incorporation of sex, gender and diversity in the research design, if applicable.
      • Evidence of commitment to the development of active and meaningful partnerships with appropriate individuals and organizations, if applicable.
    • Feasibility: extent to which the budget is appropriate and justified in relation to the proposed activities.
      • Appropriateness of the environment (academic institution and/or other organization) to enable the conduct and success of the proposed activities.
  2. Anticipated outcomes (33%)
    • Impact: potential for the outcomes of the proposed activities to have influence and impact.
    • Knowledge mobilization and dissemination: quality and appropriateness of knowledge mobilization plans, including effective dissemination, exchange and engagement with stakeholders within and/or beyond the research community, where applicable.
    • Training plan: extent to which the proposed activities incorporate plans for the training and development of highly qualified personnel (HQP).
      • Appropriate inclusion of considerations of equity, diversity and inclusion in the training plan.
  3. Applicant(s) Record (33%)
    • Expertise and experience: appropriate expertise to undertake the proposed research, including complementary and interdisciplinary knowledge, expertise and experience.
      • Experience and track record of the investigator(s) (importance, originality, quality and impact of past research).
    • Quality and extent of past contributions to the training of HQP.

Contact Us

Christine Rivas: christinerivas@cunet.carleton.ca